Truth in advertising

sausage-party-1They may as well use this poster for 99.8% of the excreta of male writers and directors, since even movies named after women aren’t about the woman.

 
 

Case in point:
streep-foster-jenkins-1

Meryl Streep is one of the finest actors of her generation. Presumably these guys paid for the privilege of having her grace their movie — and then they waste her talents by making Florence into a glorified mannequin to be posed by mediocre-on-his-best-day Hugh Grant?

We learn almost nothing about Florence except the few facts needed to create sympathy for her and mitigate the spoiled-rich-lady-using-her-fortune-to-insulate-herself-from-reality image the character otherwise might have projected. There are hints of Florence’s intriguing past — she played the piano for the president as a child! She was performing in a “violet velvet dress” the night she met Mr Bayfield! She got her own apartment as a young woman despite her father’s objections! We’d like to know more about these experiences — maybe a flashback or two? We’d like a better picture of how Florence sees herself, how she understands her ability, and what motivates her performances. We’d like to see her interacting with a female friend, perhaps, (Bechdel test fail) or exchanging more than two sentences with her Irish lady’s maid, or really having contact with anyone other than her sycophantic, wishy-washy husband or her smug, ambitious accompanist.

But no. It’s so much more important to show Hugh Grant getting wasted and dancing with someone else’s wife in the apartment Florence pays for, or cavorting in golden-sunshine-washed Long Island meadows with his lover (played by a woman 23 years younger than Grant*). We must foreground the sweet, self-sacrificing actions “Whitey” performs to protect Florence from herself. God forbid a man lowering himself to care for a woman (the way women worldwide take care of men every day) not get center stage in a movie that’s not about him. Because old fat ladies are boring and it’s a sausage party after all!

I love you Meryl. I hate you BBC.

Oh, and yes:
sausage-party-2

 
 

FEMALES ARE HOT DOG BUNS.

Whoever thought this up, may you burn in hell.

________
* I will say that in a rare and unusual departure for the movie business, Streep is 11 years older than Grant.

Shere Khan was right

Shere-KhanShere Khan has a class analysis.

Shere Khan knows that humans constitute a class that has held itself above all nonhumans, with disastrous consequences for animals and the natural world as a whole.

Mowgli is human. Regardless of any feelings Mowgli may have of being a wolf or whether he identifies with the wolf pack who raised him, his humanness is a biological fact. Raksha’s stereotypical protectiveness of Mowgli does not change this fact. Neither does Baloo’s self-interested affection or Bagheera’s paternalistic fussing.

And how do we know this? What evidence do we have of Mowgli’s human nature?

The fact that, despite his feral upbringing, despite his isolation from humans, and despite repeated warnings that “the red flower destroys everything it touches,” when his own sack is in the vise, Mowgli barely hesitates before grasping the power of his people, decimating the jungle, and endangering the lives of everyone he claims to love — leaving those he’s victimized to resolve the crisis he created.

Understand: I am not saying that Mowgli’s behavior is *caused* by his biology. I *am* saying that his social relationships, and hence his upbringing and acculturation, are inevitably shaped by the fact of his biology. All the animals know that he is a “man cub” and treat him accordingly. Mowgli knows that he is a human, he knows what behavior is right and expected for a human, and so that is how he chooses to behave. He could have chosen to behave otherwise; but he has been unable to free his mind so his ass could follow.

Shere Khan may sound nuts to you, but he has PTSD from taking a burning branch to the face. Mowgli’s father’s brutalization gives Shere Khan insight into human-animal relationships — beyond his personal animosity and desire for revenge — that may not be obvious to others. But you can see his point if you look past the dominant narrative and give his story a little thought.

Hello Hollywood — isn’t it 2016? Whoever is responsible for the revival of this drivel, for the indoctrination of another generation of children into this twisted pathological anthropomorphism, deserves to spend eternity having TED talks by wildlife conservation experts projected onto the inside of their eyelids.

And also, the only character you could imagine re-sexing was Kaa, into a one-scene, predatory, seductively murderous female? Fuck you Disney, for real.